Back to TOC
Back to Home Page
36.
Leicestershire County Championship, 1976.
B Foreman v
Author. Opening:
Q's P
We all meet players who, for reasons that are hard to
define, always seem to be beat-able
yet something about their style of play gives them a winning edge time after
time. Brian Foreman was in this
category as far as I was concerned. If
I managed to salvage a draw from any of our encounters, I felt I had done
reasonably well. 'Long, hard
struggle' was invariably a fitting title for our games.
|
1
|
d4
|
Nf6
|
|
|
2
|
c4
|
e6
|
|
|
3
|
Nf3
|
c4
|
An unusual and vigorous response from Black that
doesn't work too well
|
|
4
|
d5
|
exd5
|
|
|
5
|
cxd5
|
d6
|
Instead of gaining
space as advocated earlier, Black has allowed (rather easily) that
luxury for White
|
|
6
|
Nc3
|
Be7
|
|
|
7
|
e4
|
0-0
|
|
|
8
|
Be2
|
a6
|
|
|
9
|
a4
|
Re8
|
|
|
10
|
0-0
|
b6
|
|
|
11
|
Nd2
|
Bb7
|
|
|
12
|
Nc4
|
|
One of those elements of 'style of play' mentioned
above could be White's grasp of manoeuvring
pieces onto good squares!
|
|
|
…..
|
b5
|
|
|
13
|
Nd2
|
b4
|
At least Black has more territory on the Qs-wing.
Will this compensate for White's better grip in the centre?
|
|
14
|
Nb1
|
a5
|
|
|
15
|
f3
|
Nfd7
|
Taking the cue from White's play and moving over to
the stronger Q-side
|
|
16
|
Nc4
|
Nb6
|
|
|
17
|
Bf4
|
Nxc4
|
|
|
18
|
Bxc4
|
Nd7
|
|
|
19
|
Nd2
|
Nb6
|
|
|
20
|
Bb5
|
Rf8
|
|
|
21
|
Qe2
|
Bf6
|
|
|
22
|
Nc4
|
Nxc4
|
|
|
23
|
Bxc4
|
Qb6
|
|
|
24
|
Qc2
|
Bd4+
|
|
|
25
|
Kh1
|
Ba6
|
|
|
26
|
Bxa6
|
Qxa6
|
|
|
27
|
Rac1
|
Rab8
|
|
|
28
|
b3
|
Bc3
|
The short comings of this game, and it affects both
players, is that, due to the interlocking pawn formations, neither side
can break through easily to force through a pawn.
Here, Black blocks off White's queen and rook, possibly with the
intention of playing ..c4 when, hopefully, Black will have a passed pawn
on the b-file. With so little
else to concern him, White spots this, of course, and takes remedial
action ..
|
|
29
|
Bd2
|
Bxd2
|
|
|
30
|
Qxd2
|
|
The game is half played and already looking drawish
– but, Black tries, with some risk, to force a more favourable result
|
|
|
…..
|
f5!?
|
|
|
31
|
Rfe1
|
fxe4
|
|
|
32
|
Rxe4
|
Rbe8
|
|
|
33
|
Rxe8
|
Rxe8
|
|
|
34
|
Re1
|
Qa8
|
|
|
35
|
h3
|
|
(sealed move
at adjournment)
|
|
|
…..
|
Rxe1
|
|
|
36
|
Qxe1
|
Qf8
|
A difficult decision …. with good possibilities on
the Q-side Black must, unfortunately, look to the defence of his king
|
|
37
|
Qe6+
|
Kh8
|
|
|
38
|
Qd7
|
|
White would like to get his queen among those q-side
black pawns
|
|
|
…..
|
Qb8
|
|
|
39
|
Qc6
|
Qd8
|
|
|
40
|
Qa6
|
Kg8
|
Really, it is heading for a draw although both
players are making a valiant attempt to get a full point.
Sometimes one can try too hard and gift away what should be shared
honours. It will take a bad
mistake to resolve this conflict now, however
|
|
41
|
Kg1
|
Kf7
|
|
|
42
|
Kf1
|
Kf6
|
|
|
43
|
Qd3
|
g6
|
|
|
44
|
Qe4
|
Qe7
|
|
|
45
|
Qf4+
|
Kg7
|
|
|
46
|
Kf2
|
Qf6
|
|
|
47
|
Qe3
|
Qb2+
|
|
|
48
|
Kf1
|
Qf6
|
|
|
49
|
Qd3
|
Qe5
|
The white queen could certainly get among those black
pawns now but, the cost would be too high.
With a couple of checks, the black queen would have the b3-pawn off
the board and be all set to queen on the b-file.
White takes the safer drawing road
|
|
50
|
Kf2
|
Kf6
|
|
|
51
|
g4
|
|
Here again there is a tempter, this time for the
black queen. A check on h2 and
it could pick up the h3-pawn – but at what cost?
With the black queen out of the action on the h-file, the opposing
royal member could wreak havoc and White would almost surely have a good
passed pawn (something the black queen would not achieve with its capture)
|
|
|
…..
|
h5
|
|
|
52
|
gxh5
|
Qxh5
|
|
|
53
|
Qe4
|
Qe5
|
|
|
54
|
Qh4+
|
|
Not, of course, 54.Qxe5 when ..Kxe5 wins for Black
|
|
|
…..
|
Qg5
|
|
|
55
|
Qh8+
|
Kf7
|
|
|
56
|
Qh7+
|
Kf6
|
Draws by
repetition of moves (and perpetual check)
|
Well, no-one can say both players didn't try!
top
Game 37.
Leicestershire
County
Individual 'Challengers' Tournament, 1979.
H R Smith v
Author.
Opening: Petroff's
Defence.
The ungraded player of the white pieces was unknown to
me but admitted to having played against Roy Keene (with what result, I have
not recorded).
|
1
|
e4
|
e5
|
|
|
2
|
Nf3
|
Nf6
|
|
|
3
|
d4
|
exd4
|
|
|
4
|
e5
|
Ne4
|
This may look somewhat precarious to a player
unfamiliar with Petroffs but it is one of the accepted lines
|
|
5
|
Qxd4
|
d5
|
|
|
6
|
exd6 ep
|
Nxd6
|
|
|
7
|
Nc3
|
|
The commencement of a line I did not know.
More usually met here is 7. Bd3
|
|
|
…..
|
Nc6
|
|
|
8
|
Qf4
|
g6
|
|
|
9
|
Bd2
|
Bg7
|
|
|
10
|
0-0-0
|
0-0
|
|
|
11
|
Bd3
|
Be6
|
|
|
12
|
h4
|
h5
|
Afterwards my opponent said this was wrong (it
certainly turns out that way)
|
|
13
|
Rde1
|
Qf6??
|
White quickly spots his chance …
|
|
14
|
Qxf6
|
Bxf6
|
|
|
15
|
Bxg6!
|
Bg4!
|
A clever attempt to get something back out of the
pawn loss
|
|
16
|
Be4
|
|
Trying to avoid having his pawns doubled
|
|
|
…..
|
Bxc3
|
The start of a risky combination which should have
lost the game for Black
|
|
17
|
bxc3
|
Nxe4
|
|
|
18
|
Rxe4
|
Bxf3
|
|
|
19
|
gxf3
|
Kh7
|
|
|
20
|
Rf4
|
f5
|
A shrewd defensive move – but, Black should still
lose
|
|
21
|
Rg1
|
Nd8!
|
Black not only gets the knight away from the black
squares threatened by the bishop but, if White plays his intended R-check
to win the pawn on c7, the
knight could then fork White's two rooks
|
|
22
|
Rg7+
|
Kh6
|
|
|
23
|
Re7
|
Kg6
|
It is difficult for both sides to continue to find
the right moves in this sort of position.
White has a big plus due to his initiative but could easily slip
up…..
|
|
24
|
Rd4??
|
|
Intent on doubling his rook power on the seventh
rank, he does exactly that with an outright blunder…..
|
|
|
…..
|
Nc6
|
|
|
25
|
Re6+
|
Kf7
|
|
|
26
|
Rxc6
|
|
As advocated previously, if you are going to lose
material, do so at the highest price – White gains the bonus of doubling
Black's pawns on the c-file
|
|
|
|
bxc6
|
|
|
27
|
Rd7+
|
Kg6
|
|
|
28
|
Rxc7
|
Rfc8
|
With this move, I offered a draw which was declined.
The reader may wonder at my offer ….
I assumed that White would exchange the rooks and that my superior
rook v bishop would be nullified by White's extra pawns which his king and
bishop should hold. However
…..
|
|
29
|
Rg7+
|
|
I had overlooked this (and White's next) continuation
|
|
|
…..
|
Kh6
|
|
|
30
|
Rg5
|
Rg8
|
|
|
31
|
Rxf5
|
Rad8
|
A rather obvious mating threat
|
|
32
|
b3
|
Rg1+
|
|
|
33
|
Kb2
|
Rg2
|
|
|
34
|
Be5
|
Rd5
|
|
|
35
|
Bf4+
|
Kg6
|
|
|
36
|
Rxd5
|
|
The extra tempo gained by White because of the
re-take gives him the chance to protect all his pawns – and, given his
pawn superiority, will he now win?
|
|
|
…..
|
cxd5
|
|
|
37
|
Bg3
|
Rg1
|
|
|
38
|
c3
|
Re1
|
|
|
39
|
b4
|
Re2+
|
|
|
40
|
Kb3
|
Re8
|
|
|
41
|
a4
|
Kf5
|
The king must lend a hand – the rook will not be
able to stop those Q-side pawns on his own
|
|
42
|
b5
|
Ke6
|
|
|
43
|
a5
|
|
The situation would be critical for Black, maybe, if
it wasn't for his pawn on d5. As
the position is, he should comfortably handle White's two-to-one pawn
advance given the power of the rook
|
|
|
…..
|
Kd7
|
|
|
44
|
c4
|
|
A risky move – for both players!
If black is tempted (and
it is a strong temptation) to push the pawn onwards, he could lose it to a
combined attack by the bishop and king.
White's Q-side pawns might then become a force to be reckoned with.
Black finds a clever rebuttal ….
|
|
|
…..
|
Rc8!
|
|
|
45
|
cxd5
|
Rc5
|
|
|
46
|
Kb4
|
Rxd5
|
(sealed move
at adjournment)
|
|
47
|
Bb8
|
a6!
|
|
|
48
|
bxa6
|
|
White's chances of forcing a pawn through on this
wing have now totally evaporated
|
|
|
…..
|
Kc6!
|
A much more commanding move than ..Kc8
|
|
49
|
Kc4
|
|
This seems to have no merit over the obvious-looking
49. a7 which would tie down either rook or king to stopping the pawn from
queening and allow the white king some chance of trying to shepherd
through a K-side pawn
|
|
|
…..
|
Rxa5
|
|
|
50
|
Bg3??
|
|
I would rate this move weird!
White has totally abandoned the poor little chap on a6, obviously
to save the one on h4 after the check which comes.
Yet, he could still have protected his f-pawn's advance to f4
(blocking this capture) from the b8 square and
the rook could not prevent this because it could not immediately
leave the a-file to take the pawn
|
|
|
…..
|
Ra4+
|
(Forcing the king backwards)
|
|
51
|
Kd3
|
Rxa6
|
|
|
52
|
Ke4
|
Ra5
|
|
|
53
|
f4
|
Kd6
|
Always use
your king in end-game play
|
|
54
|
Kf3?
|
|
White probably has an impossible task but this
backward step is no help with the g4 square denied to the king.
He should have grasped the nettle and played the pawn on to f5
|
|
|
…..
|
Ke6
|
Further moves up to the looming draw are now really
irrelevant
|
|
55
|
f5+
|
Kxf5
|
|
|
56
|
Bf4
|
Ra3+
|
|
|
57
|
Be3
|
Ra4
|
|
|
58
|
Bg5
|
Rg4
|
|
|
59
|
Ke3
|
Rg1
|
|
|
60
|
f3
|
Rg2
|
|
|
61
|
Be7
|
Rb2
|
|
|
62
|
Bg5
|
Rb3+
|
|
|
63
|
Kf2
|
|
Draw agreed.
The only slight danger in these final moves was for White in
that Black might have sacrificed his rook by taking the bishop on g5 to
run through his h-pawn but this could not, of course, be attempted with
the white king able to catch the pawn
|
|