Chapter 6: Medieval Years back to the Viking conquests

 

Just prior to this period, as we work our way backwards through the years, if we had truly travelled back in time to Skillington of old, I think we would have been surprised at just how well we would have related to those forebears of nearly 400 years ago.  The written language was still readable (with some effort) and, I suspect, the spoken tongue would have seemed little different from travelling to a part of the country today where a strong local dialect prevails.   The hardier ones among us would have adapted quickly to the way of life, I believe.   The format for a person's name was also as it is today, albeit often spelt as it sounded to the ear of the recorder.  The period we are now entering, though, is to see us leave behind nearly all familiar things.   Except to a scholar, the spoken word may well, as we travel on, become almost incomprehensible.  People's names often reflected their place of origin, their trade or, even, some characteristic of their person.  Only the spires of the churches would have reached up to the heavens, comfortingly, on the high ground of each village as they do now – and, even these would have disappeared from our sight as we travel on into the past beyond the 13th century (the churches were there but without the later spires).  In the previous chapters, life may have seemed hard but now it becomes, perhaps, fearsome.

One later benefit would have been the protective cloak of the lord of the manor, and assuming, that is, one had a reasonable man as lord of the manor.   However, in medieval times the lords themselves – and the barons above them – were still jockeying, scheming and fighting, for the possession of land.   These were, surely, unsettling times for the peasants who worked the land as they emerged from being slaves into being free men.   What truly gritty characters they must have been!

Let us consider here what sort of landscape we have travelled back to and look briefly at the communities which were sparsely dotted about that landscape.   The population of England at the time of the Domesday Book, which we will deal with shortly, has been estimated at something around a million-and-a-quarter people, with our county town of Lincoln being about the third largest town, behind London and York , with six to seven thousand inhabitants.   The countryside was that of a wilderness of forests and swamps.   In the depths of these forests were small isolated communities, occupying clearings much smaller than the size of our modern parish, each of which had been hacked out of the woodland and cleared for the plough.   Each was under the direct control of a lord who was appointed by the king, for the king owned all the land.   And each community was largely made up of peasants, some being, in theory, free men ( Lincolnshire had a very large percentage of free men compared with most parts of the Country), but all being under the firm control of the local lord.  The only other men of the community who were given the same status as the lord of the manor were the priests or abbots.   In Skillington, the lord may well have lived at what is now called The Abbey.   This did have a moat for its protection so someone of great importance lived there sometime in this period – but the house itself would have looked completely different from its appearance now.   The main farm or "home farm" (called in the Domesday Book the demesne) would be that which was personally run by the lord.   From its title and history, Home Farmhouse on Middle Street held that distinction!   Originally both would have been so-called long huts, timber framed with mud infilling and supported by rows of stout timber posts, visible inside the building.   The fire would have been in the centre of the main, communal room with its smoke drifting up through a hole in the roof.  Such buildings would have been added to or modified (in the manner we still do, of course).   The simpler structures of the peasants were never intended to last much more than a life's span but they often did.  Other farmers, each of which lived in a cottage with a small garden within the village area, had to work so many days a week for the lord and also to give him dues of money or of farm produce.   In addition, they had to pay "fines" to him, not for any wrongdoing, but for a ragbag of reasons ….  getting married; taking over a new piece of land; having one's corn ground at the lord's mill; and, worse, the widow of a man who had died had to give her best beast to the lord and the second best to the priest!    There was much arbitrary imposition of fines (or boons) by lords and the only "lawful" means of regulating this was by past usage or practice.        

Some of the monarchs of this long era would become sufficiently famous to remain household names even in present times ……..

Elizabeth I (1558 – 1603) gave her name to an age.   She stood firm against Spanish aggression with her most famous sea captain and former pirate, Drake, seeing off the Armada .   In the latter context, one of her speeches ranks as on a par with those of Winston Churchill in the 2ndWW.  For Winston's admirers, I remind you of part of her speech … starting with "Let tyrants fear …" and going on to say, "I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman: but I have the heart and stomach of a king – and a king of England too – and think it foul scorn that Parma or Spain or any Prince of Europe should dare invade the borders of my realm…".  In her dealings with home affairs, she skilfully balanced the now-established Parliament's wishes against those of the Crown (this had collapsed under the later monarchy of the previous chapter); and she got her bishops and parish priests, as well as her justices of the peace, to administer local law and order.   Even more importantly, she encouraged a religious tolerance.  All may have not been perfect – but it worked.  And, together with the cultural stirrings exemplified by the contribution of Shakespeare and others, her reign became a Golden Age.   In this Golden Age, the staple diet was beef, bread and beer.   People ate with their fingers, filling wooden trenchers from centrally placed bowls.   There were spoons and knives (for the wealthy) but no forks.   Elizabeth improved the coinage, which had become debased.   Mostly it was now to be of gold or silver, called sterling money.   Only for the poor were small pieces of brass, called a farthing, or fourth part of a penny, still allowed, though ' no man was forced to accept them in payment for rent or debt.'  The coinage had some names long now lost to us … the Sovereign (not so long ago, this one) = 30 shillings (£1.50); the Ryal = 15 shillings; the Angel = 10s and the Groat = four-and-a-half pence.  

Her father, the formidable Henry VIII, is the next sovereign to tower in the history books.   He reigned from 1547 to 1558.   It is ironic that he worried so much about getting a male heir when it was his daughter Elizabeth who achieved so much!   Most people know, of course, that it was this Henry who took on the Church and dissolved the monasteries.  It is less well known that it was he who gave the instructions to his Chancellor, Thomas Cromwell, which started the keeping of registers for baptisms, weddings and burials.   This practice commenced in 1538.   A photocopy of the earliest record for Skillington, that for the year 1542, is shown on page 125.   Before Henry and his marital problems, came Henry VII, who had triumphed in neighbouring Leicestershire, at Bosworth Field , over the last Plantaganet king, Richard III , in 1485.   Richard as a boy accompanied the funeral cortege of his father through Grantham on its way to Pontefract.   His father's widow held the Lordship of Grantham at that time.  Henry VII's eldest daughter, Margaret Tudor, spent some time in Grantham, too, in 1503 when she married the King of Scotland (she was 13 then). The 1200s and 1300s saw battles against France involve several monarchs and religious wars in the middle-east cause several to be out of the country for long periods – Richard the Lionheart sounds inspiring but he was away too long to be of much service to his country.

In 1215, John capitulated to his barons at Runnymede and signed the Magna Carta but, did this help Skillington?   It is doubtful.  Interestingly, for a local connection with Skillington, King John held his court in February 1213 at The Angel and Royal Hotel in Grantham, reputed to be the oldest inn in the country!  

Back to top

People:  I have said earlier in this chapter that the people of this country must have been "gritty characters" to survive the hardships thrown at them during this period.  These included invasion (a successful one, too!), political and religious turmoil – they had to tread pretty warily to survive the stake during 'Bloody Mary's' reign – and pestilence and other natural calamities.  Here, taken from the Parish Records, are the names of those Skillington villagers who were still around from 1637 to the late 1500s.   Many names in the records have been omitted because the records themselves were unreadable or because I could not decipher the ancient script used during this time.   Some of the names below will already be familiar to us ….

Abbott, Allan (Allen), Amson (?), Bagworth, Bau(x?)field (Boyfield), Baxter (?), Baker(?), Bennet, Birdson(?), Bridge(?), Browne, Bullymor, Chamberline (Chamberlain), Cook, Cooper, Christian, Dawson, Denton, Foxon, Gibbons, Goodroofe, Greene, Hill, Holit, Hollingworth, Ingleton, Irkinson(?), Jamesby(?), Kempe(?), Kilsman(?), Loveridge(?), Loveroad, Lyill, Marriott(?), Mason, Midlsbrooke, Moroo(?), Newton, Owscroft, Parker, Paxton, Paxteran(?), Pillfoote(or Peilfoote), Rayson(?), Reynolds, Robynson, Rudd, Samill, Snow, Stalor(?), Sutton, Tallamer(?),  Templeman, Thornton, Turston(?), Underwater, Wallpoole, Woodrough, Wright, Wrigg, Wyldman.

The photocopy of the very first page of Skillington's Parish Record I found extremely hard to decipher, but my attempt is adjacent to the photocopy of that page in the illustrations following this chapter.

It was in 1066 that the event having the most impact on the lives of the people of England occurred.   William, Duke of Normandy, defeated King Harold and brought a harsh and foreign regime to this land.   It affected the major landowners particularly, the nobility of the pre-conquest years, but some of its repercussions must have filtered down to the ordinary peasants who tilled Skillington's and other village fields.   He also brought in the French language (to some extent) and plenty of his victorious earls – to be given English land and dwellings as a reward for their services.   But, in 1086, William the Conqueror initiated the first great census of England , the celebrated Domesday Book.   This would enable him to collect taxes directly, rather than from local lords.   But, whatever his motives, it was a colossal achievement in its scope and thoroughness.

These were the "terms of reference" for this great undertaking ….

"Here follows the inquest of lands, as the king's barons made it, to wit: by the oath of the sheriff of the shire and all the barons and their Frenchmen and of the whole hundred, of the priest, the reeve, six villagers of each village.   In order, what is the manor called?   Who held it in the time of King Edward?   Who now holds it?   How many hides?( A hide or hyde was an Anglo-Saxon measure of arable land varying from 40 to 120 acres.   One hide was regarded as sufficient to support one peasant and his family: the area that could be ploughed in a season by one plough and a team of oxen).   How many ploughs on the demesne?   How many of the men?   How many villagers?   How many cottars?   How many slaves?   How many free men?   How many sokemen?   How much wood?   How much meadow?   How much pasture?   How many mills?   How many fish ponds?   How much has been added or taken away?   How much, taken together, it was worth and how much now?   How much each free man or sokeman had or has?   All this at three dates, to wit in the time of King Edward and when King William gave it and as it is now.   And if it is possible for more to be had than is had."  

Back to top

The following details of the Domesday Book, applicable to Skillington, take in several of our headings (i.e. People, Dwellings and Farming).   This record will not tell us the names of peasants but it gives some indication of how many there were.   It does give us the names of those holding land at that time, however.   Before we look at Skillington in 1086 let us understand the ancient terms used although all are not used in the extracts below ….    A Villein was a peasant who gave dues and services to his lord in exchange for land (he might hold somewhere between 10 to 30 acres).  These were free men and they were the most numerous element in society at the time of the Domesday Book.   Their status slowly declined to serfdom in the early 14th Century but when the Black Death caused severe labour shortages on the land, this status improved.  By the 1400s they were replaced by the system of free tenure.   Below the villeins were Cottars and Bordars.   These were cottagers who had, perhaps, between 1 and 5 acres of land.    A Serf was, of course, a slave.  A Sokeman was part of the upper stratum of peasant society, being holder of land by free tenure.   (This was an Anglo-Saxon term). A large holding of land by a villein (say 30 acres) was called a Virgate or Yardland.   A Carucate was an area of arable land which could be ploughed in a season.   Meadow or woodland was measured by the Warnode. (Approx. 40 to 60 acres).   As well as the workers of the soil, there were the craftsmen …. the blacksmith (it is hard to imagine his name not being Selby in Skillington!), carpenter; stone mason; thatcher; etc.   Due to the smaller size of villages then, many would have been itinerant, plying their crafts in a cluster of villages.

Skillington references taken from Domesday Book – 31 Lincolnshire by Phillimore, edited by Philip Morgan and Caroline Thorn (Grantham Library).

"In Skillington (Schillintune) Colbert had 1 carucate of land taxable.  Land for 12 oxen Guy has…12 villagers with 1 plough; and meadow, 20 acres in Algar's warnode; underwood, 20 acres in the Archbishop's warnode. Value before 1066 and now, 20s."

"In Skillington Karli had 1 carucate of land taxable.  Land for 1 plough.  He also still has it in alms; he has there …4 villagers with 1 plough; and meadow, 20 acres.  Value before 1066 and now, 20s."

"In Skillington Earl Morcar had 3 carucates of land taxable and Frithgestr and Beorhtmaer 1 carucate of land taxable.  Land for 5 ½ ploughs.  A free jurisdiction of Skillington.  Walchelin, the Archbishop's man (has) 2 ploughs…13 villagers and 5 Freemen who have 4 ploughs.  Meadow, 121 ½ acres; woodland pasture in Bishop Remegius's warnode, 60 acres.  Value before 1066 £4; now the same. Exactions 20s.

There also (and) in Easton , Siward  had 3 carucates of land taxable.  Land for 3 ploughs and 6 oxen.  Osbern, the Archbishop's man, has 1 plough… 12 villagers and 6 smallholders, ½ church; 1 mill, 8s; meadow, 10 acres; woodland pasture, 240 acres.  Value before 1066, 40s; now 40s."

"In Colsterworth, Earl Morcar had 3 carucates of land taxable.  A jurisdiction of Skillington.  4 Freemen and 4 villagers have 2 ploughs.  Woodland, pasture in places, 120 acres."

"In Skillington, a jurisdiction of Grantham, 3 carucates of land taxable.  Land for 3 ploughs.  14 villagers, 2 smallholders and 1 Freeman have 3 ploughs and meadow, 10 acres and underwood, 140 acres.  Its assessment is in Grantham."

"They state that the warnode of 4d from 60 acres of woodland which lies in Skillington belongs in Bytham."

Although no scholar of the Domesday Book, I would sum this up as follows ….

There were 16 carucates of taxable arable land.  The major arable landowner was Earl Morcar, who was one of the grandsons of Leofric and Lady Godiva.  The other two were Siward and whoever held the Skillington land at Grantham…. possibly Queen Edith?  The smaller owners – 1 carucate each – were Colbert, Karli, Frithgestr and Beorhtmaer.  Farming this within the parish were, possibly, these last four plus Walchelin and Osbern, the "Archbishop's men" (did these two share the duties of village priest as well as farm on behalf of the Church?) and the following small local landowners and workers – 6 Freemen, 12 Smallholders and 59 villagers.  To tackle the arable fields were 23 ½ ploughs, which includes a total of 188 oxen!

The none-arable land was – 181 ½ acres of meadow, 420 acres of pasture among woodland, 160 acres of underwood (bushes and scrubland?) and 60 acres (at least) of woodland.  The owners of this were the Archbishop and Bishop Remegius (or are these one and the same?),Guy and Algar.

In addition are mentioned a mill and half a church (which perhaps agrees with the shared clerical duties?).  No fish ponds are mentioned but I would be surprised if these did not exist.

But, travelling on to days even earlier than William's Domesday Book, we find the earliest record of the names of men of Skillington village! [Erratum: The following text is in error as the first Lay Subsidy Roll did not appear until post-Conquest – 1290 in fact. The record below is therefore of a later date or, if indeed from Canute’s reign, it is some other tax listing]  In 1018, King Canute levied a large subsidy across the nation.   It is called the Lay Subsidy Roll.   Skillington's comprises the following names and the tax levied upon each one.  

Back to top

William Danet 

 

11s 21/4d  

Alexander de Wywell'  

 

1s 8d  

Richard de Herington'  

 

9s 01/4d  

Stephen de Langtoft          

 

1s 10d  

John Bully  

 

2s  

Nicholas filius Thome  

 

9s 11/2d  

Richard de Ses                       

 

1s 21/4d  

Thomas de Somerderby     

 

8s 1d  

Richard de Cumbtorp'    

 

2s 21/4d  

Thomas Berdeyn    

 

2s 61/4d  

Nicholas in venella

 

1s 4d  

            Simon filius Thome    

 

8d  

[note:  filius means "son of".   The above Lay Subsidy information was taken     from the internet and was compiled by Dr D A Postles of the University of Leicester.   It had not been proof read]

Buildings:  If the manor house, later known as The Abbey, was really connected with such an establishment, this is the period in which we should find some reference to that origin.  Henry VIII, for well-known reasons, had a survey of religious houses carried out in his reign.  Although there are two references to Skillington's church in the Valor Ecclesiasticus there is apparently no mention of an abbey!  One must conclude that this house name was given on a whim or for some other tenuous reason at a much later time.   

Back to top

Religion:    The people of the land, from king and barons to the lowliest peasants and slaves were devoutly Christian in their beliefs throughout the Medieval period.   Where early church buildings stood – and Skillington's has parts dating to pre-Conquest times* – the new masters improved or renovated them.   There is one clear and one faint example of, what I have been informed, is a "scratch dial" in the stonework, see earlier photograph on page 114.  I have also been informed that there is one at Colsterworth church and that they may be associated with Sir Isaac Newton who had more than a passing interest in sundials.  However, another book on churches, which I have read, states that the stonemasons usually left their mark on the stones and their apprentices practised their skills with compasses on the stonework.  Because of the small size of these scratch dials, I believe the latter explanation of their presence is the most likely.

Whatever state St James was in; whatever existed, it was built upon from the early 13th century (the chancel arch, according to the booklet in the church).   But, this booklet tells us, most of the present structure was built in the later 13th and the 14th centuries – this is when the spire may have been added.  This is an incredible period of time for a building to have stood.   Its patchwork of stones from different ages and the signs of repairs that its ravaged faces show emphasise its antiquity.   I believe it is a proud monument to the successive communities which have laboured within its vicinity and worshipped within its walls for so long … well over a thousand years!   Imagine how many generations this represents.   Also, when one thinks what sort of buildings even the wealthy occupied at that time, at what expense and to what ultimate magnificence were the churches built!

[* - Anglo-Saxon stonework is visible in two places – long and short quoining (quoin is dressed stone at the angle of a building) is found at the north-east corner of the nave and south-east quoins in the south chapel. These early churches of the Saxons were usually built of wood originally].

And what of the patron saint of Skillington's fine church, Saint James?  The millennium kneeler project book, dealt with earlier, has considerable detail about this man and his holy shrine, which lies in north-west Spain .  He was, of course, an apostle and he is alleged to have journeyed to Compostela in Spain .  His Spanish name was Sant Iago and his legend in that country grew in the 9th century, for, although he was martyred in 44AD in Jerusalem , it is alleged that his body was returned to Spain .  Following a "revelation", pilgrims began to trek to Santiago de Compostela.   

The religious houses (monasterial orders) in early medieval times included "The House of Austin Canons of the Arrouasian Reform".   I believe it was this order which founded the Abbey of Bourne in 1138 …. And, the original endowment consisted of several churches including that at Skillington.   This is as far back as I can get with the buildings of Skillington.

The priests who worked and worshipped so diligently within this House of God are only traceable back to 1250.   The first shadowy figure to emerge at that time bore the name Savaricus (which sounds almost Roman).   His successor in 1275 was Peter de Butmiswell (the "de" a legacy from the Norman conquest); then came Nicholas of Ingham (1287); Thomas of Whissenden (1337) [here I must confess to some satisfaction that, even in those long-distant times, my own place of origin prior to my coming to this village, Whissendine, was linked with Skillington in some way!]; William Thrappe of Belver (1366); Richard Preston (1389); John Cotes of Tewelby(?) (1420); Robert Large of Sproxton (1421); Thomas Wryght (1435); Thomas Hanley (1452); William Payreweder (1454); Simon Waynflete (1456); Robert Poliamb (1461); Hugh Clyston (1492); Geoffery Willughby (1517); Leonard Calvard (1548); Thomas Simpsome (1550); John Porter (1554); Richard Allen (1569); Thomas Bevre (1582); John Parker (1587) and Thomas Bearne (1633).

Many of these names obviously reflect the villages where they originate.  And two have  later connections with the stalwarts of the village we have already met …. Allen and Parker.   

What can we say about these ethereal holy men of Skillington who guided their flocks through so many years of change?   They did have a personal interest in the successful farming of the land, for they, as well as the Lords of the Manor, stood to gain considerably from successful harvests in the way of the tithes they received.   They were personally much more involved in farming than present-day vicars and, although they may not, individually, have been liked any more than a modern incumbent, they were certainly held in much higher esteem due to their status in society then.   Assuming no breaks in the sequence (taken from the list inside the church), the early priests held their living in Skillington for long periods (Nicholas of Ingham for 50 years!).   There was a run of short-lived (perhaps literally?) vicars approaching the mid-1400s ( 2, 2, and 5 years in succession) but then longer periods are restored with another 50-year period by John Parker from 1587.   This would make Nicholas and John extremely old men for those times … perhaps that was due to their high standard of living?

A reference to Skillington in this period was found in page 123 of the Lincolnshire Notes and Queries in Grantham Library.  It stated, "In Schillintun De hospit. dim. car.   De tra ecclie dim. car."  The translation* is … "In Skillington, from the hospital (or house of hospitality) half a carucate:  from church land, half a carucate". The "hospit." is, perhaps, our first positive sign that there may have been some type of abbey in the village.  The spelling of Skillington dates this to c11th century. [*translation through the kind auspices of new vicar, Father David Carney]

Other events:   I have mentioned, in the introduction to this period, peasants becoming free men.   This began to occur from the middle of the 13th century.   The villeins started to be given their independence around this time and, as proof of their right to the land they were given, each one received a copy of the manor court's written testimony to this.   Thus, they became "copyholders", a term which was to last until c1926.   However, when they left it, the land reverted back to the Lord of the Manor.

Just a brief look here at the court system which held sway in each manor.   There were two courts, first the Court Baron.   This court decided on custom and usage within the manor and was particularly concerned with the title or ownership of property. The second was the Court Leet.   This dealt with misdemeanours committed within the manor.

A place where the villagers could all meet to talk over their grievances, or perhaps to hold court (there was no pub then or other meeting house) was around a central point.   This took the form of a moot cross – moot meaning "to debate a point or proposal".   Someone of wealth, perhaps the priest or lord, decided in the period 1200 to 1299 (archaeological dating of the cross from refs by Sites and Monuments Record) to erect for the inhabitants of Skillington just such a focal monument.  Alas, the cross itself, which was its crowning glory, did not survive until this day … and yet it may be lying, buried

somewhere near to The Square.   I posed the question earlier as to why the stump was moved.  One has to wonder why it was erected in The Square in the first place!  My own theory on this is that the area now called The Square was probably the nearest large open space to the medieval village area – see my sketch below, of a possible Skillington at around this time.

 Back to top

click on the photo to enlarge

 
Page 123.jpg (103796 bytes)

Author's sketch of a possible medieval Skillington.

 

 


Page 123b.jpg (35332 bytes)

An example of illuminated writing from the learned holy men of medieval England.  If an Abbey did indeed, despite the lack of evidence, exist in Skillington, then, in this quiet retreat, such beautiful handiwork as this may have been produced.

 

click on the photo to enlarge

 
  Page 124.jpg (173626 bytes)


A page from Skillington's Parish Register showing burials, late 1500s. Even to the untutored eye, although difficult, some names can be read …  …  

1584 looks like Elizabeth Thomson; 1585, the second one is an Allen;  Fiona(?) Wright in 1586, Elizabeth Wright in 1588, John(?) Wright in 1590 and (?) Wright in 1592; Elynor Pilfote also in 1592; Elizabeth Stalor in 1593; William Newton in 1594 (this one confirmed by Newton family tree);  etc.

(Photocopy from Grantham Library, reduced from A4)  

 

 

 

 
Page 125.jpg (230368 bytes)


The very first page of Skillington's Parish Register showing Christenings in the year 1541(?).  (Photocopy from Grantham Library reduced from A4).  The Author's attempt at a translation of this page is below.

 

Christenings
                        
(1541?)

Richard Thomson was baptized …….  

Jane(?) Musson ……………………..19th of April  
A Dm 1542  

Thomas Newton …………………………….September  

Ann (?) ……………………………………of October

                                    A Dm 1543  

Margrett Wright was baptized ……..  

Elizabeth Manson [possibly Manton] ……….April  

Margrett Manson …………………………….October(?)  

                                A Dm 1544  

Thomas Manson …………………………..of August  

John Newton ………………………………of December

                                    1545

Alice(?)

            ???

            ???

            ??? …………………………………………….April

                                    1546  

            [I could not decypher any for this year]

                                    1547  

William (?) was baptized …………..  

John Lange(?) ………………..  

Isobell Dove(?) ………………  

Jean Taylor …………………..

                                    1548  

            E(?)ryn (Marriott?) – [I was very unsure about this line]  

James (?) …………………….

                                    1549  

            (?) Wayne(?) …………………  

William Wrigsby ……………

Back to top
Home 
TOC

Go to Chapter 7